Coin-free guarantee.

There is no coin, and Verafy Harness will never need one. A harness is paid in whatever token a contract offers and pays its own AI and hosting bills from that. No presale, no airdrop, no points, no treasury. How payment works

Verafy Harness v0.0.4-alpha

Roadmap

Three stages. Each one has to be done before the next is worth starting.

Stage 1: Build it on Solana programs, with no SIMD

Verafy Harness settles on Solana with ordinary programs: verafy_ruling, verafy_judiciary and verafy_registry. None of them needs a change to Solana itself. Stage 1 bootstraps everything a v1 network needs on top of them:

Piece Status
The harness: intake, pinned evidence, signer, bond, runtime Built
Juries across open-weight model families, commit and reveal, slashing Built (v0.0.3-alpha)
Settlement program for rulings (verafy_ruling) Built; measured on a local validator
Judiciary Signer for Squads wallets (verafy_judiciary) Built; measured on a local validator against Squads from mainnet
Policies and Covenant Launch Built in core
Harness registry, discovery and on-chain pay (verafy_registry) Built; measured on a local validator
Model certification for closed models Built; no closed model measured yet
Hardware attestation (AMD SEV-SNP) Verification built; no harness running in an enclave yet
Launcher (verafy up, one-click cloud) Built
Local testnet Built
Devnet deployment of the three programs Next
Internal infrastructure: Verafy's own harnesses, monitoring, a public jury Next

Done when: the three programs are on devnet, Verafy runs a public jury, and an outside wallet can attach a Judiciary Signer without help.

Stage 2: Prove it with 10 to 50 pilots

Real wallets, real launches, real rulings. Verafy builds each pilot alongside the customer, then turns what it built into something the next customer gets for free:

Candidates and the case for each: Pilots.

Done when: at least 10 wallets have a Judiciary Signer attached in production, with their rulings, costs and disputes published.

Stage 3: Show the demand, then scale to a SIMD and beyond

A SIMD asks Solana's validators to change the protocol. It's worth proposing only when programs are measurably not enough, and real usage shows what belongs in the protocol. Examples: a cost per ruling only native support would lower, or a proof check programs can't afford.

Done when: a SIMD is proposed with production numbers behind it.

The rule behind the order: VIP-0017, programs first, SIMD on adoption. Detailed milestones: ROADMAP.md.